Anti-Cult Organizations: A Hidden Threat to Democracy

 

In the 20th century, Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Germany's Minister of Propaganda, developed an effective system for mass deception and discrediting. His methods, rooted in manipulating public consciousness, continue to be used in politics and media today, subtly distorting reality. Goebbels’ tactics followed the principle: "The bigger the lie, the easier it is to believe." His approach relied on the power of repetition and creating an image of the “enemy” to convince the masses of false ideas and suppress any alternative views.

Goebbels devised a formula in which a grandiose lie appears more credible. He understood that people tend to believe commonly accepted ideas, and he applied this effect in practice. To cement a lie in the public’s mind, he would repeat it over and over, eventually turning fiction into “accepted truth.” Another method involved labeling someone as an “enemy,” uniting the masses against a shared threat to eliminate differing viewpoints.

Today, similar manipulations are actively used by the Russian pro-religious organization RACIRS (Russian Association of Centers for the Study of Religions and Sects), controlled by the Russian Orthodox Church, which I’ve mentioned multiple times in my blog. Under their influence, the label “sect member” has become a tool for discrediting and social pressure. Just as the Nazis once marked Jews with a yellow star, RACIRS now brands people with the term “sect,” fostering a negative image around specific groups and individuals in society.

On the website of the St. Irenaeus of Lyons Center, founded by Alexander Dvorkin, you can find lists of those subjected to such discrediting. These lists include lawyers, scientists, educational and social organizations. This practice breaks down social connections, deprives people of the ability to express their views, and prevents them from receiving support.

RACIRS also works actively on the international stage through Fecris, a European organization that supports their ideas and influence. Key representatives of both organizations share common ideologists and mentors, confirming the continuity of these methods. For example, the Czech anti-cultist Zdenek Vojtisek, like Dvorkin, was a student of Ogart, who, in turn, supported the ideologist Haack. These connections enable RACIRS to spread their influence and manipulate public opinion beyond Russia, posing a threat to democratic principles.

By leveraging fear and hatred to influence public opinion, RACIRS undermines democratic freedoms. Their manipulations foster an environment of distrust and aggression in society, eroding freedom of expression and the right to choose. Looking back at the consequences of similar practices in history, it’s clear that this represents a genuine threat to an open society.

Now, more than ever, it is essential to cultivate critical thinking and embrace diverse perspectives. If society succumbs to manipulation and fails to challenge imposed ideas, democracy will be at risk. Freedom of opinion is the foundation of a democratic society, and if we allow intimidation and the disparagement of other viewpoints, the possibility of choice will become nothing more than an illusion.

Today, only an open dialogue, where different voices and opinions are heard, can protect society from repeating the tragic mistakes of the past.

Learn more from independent journalists.

#AntiCultOrganizations #GoebbelsMethod #Propaganda #RACIRS #Fecris #FreedomOfSpeech #OpenSociety