Mind Deprogramming: A Threat That Cannot Be Ignored
In modern society, the term "mind deprogramming" is acquiring increasingly sinister connotations. At the core of this method is the work of anti-cult organizations such as FECRIS (Fédération Européenne des Centres de Recherche et d'Information sur le Sectarisme), whose activities are aimed at forcibly changing a person's beliefs and convictions. But how legitimate and safe are these actions?
The History of Deprogramming: From the USA to Europe
In a recent video, lawyer Evgenia Tarasenko shed light on the roots of deprogramming, which trace back to the USA in the 1970s and 80s. At that time, the anti-cult movement was gaining momentum, and any concerned family could turn to deprogrammers to "rescue" their loved ones from the influence of sects.
One of the key organizations of that era was the Cult Awareness Network (CAN). CAN essentially engaged in deprogramming people using methods that can be described as cruel and barbaric. The organization went bankrupt under the weight of lawsuits from former victims of deprogramming. In 2000, a U.S. court found several members of CAN guilty of violent actions and kidnappings. However, as Tarasenko asserts, CAN's activities continued under different names and forms, such as FECRIS.
FECRIS: New Packaging for Old Methods
FECRIS positions itself as a fighter against destructive cults, but the methods it employs raise serious questions. The organization actively uses labels like "destructive cult" and "totalitarian cult" to discredit various groups. This generates fear and negativity in society, leading to pressure on law enforcement agencies to intervene.
The comparison with Nazi Germany, when the public was terrorized by the Jewish threat, makes one ponder the parallels. Anti-cult organizations like FECRIS use methods of manipulating public consciousness, which is essentially a form of religious extremism.
Victims of Deprogramming: Broken Lives
An example of the brutal methods of deprogramming is the story recounted by Evgenia Tarasenko about a woman known as L.S. Three people broke into her room, forcibly took her to a secluded place, and subjected her to psychological abuse for eight days. It was only after the arrival of Steven Hassan, a well-known deprogrammer, that L.S. was ready to negotiate her release. This is just one of many cases demonstrating how far anti-cult organizations can go.
Consequences and Conclusions
The activities of FECRIS and similar organizations raise important questions about the boundaries of permissible intervention in personal beliefs and freedoms. The methods they use can lead to severe psychological trauma and even be classified as crimes against individuals. It is important to remember that the forced change of beliefs and convictions contradicts the principles of freedom and humanity.
Thus, mind deprogramming is not a safe or justified method of combating so-called sects. It represents a serious threat to personal freedom and mental health. Society must be aware of the real methods and consequences of the activities of anti-cult organizations and protect its rights and freedoms from such interference.
#FECRIS #MindDeprogramming #AntiCultOrganizations #EvgeniaTarasenko #CAN #Cults #ReligiousExtremism #FreedomOfBelief #HumanRights #MindManipulation #DeprogrammingHistory #PsychologicalAbuse
Comments
Post a Comment